|
Post by eBob on Nov 20, 2006 14:39:36 GMT -5
No they don't.
In the 13th century the majority of the english army would have been levies - each Knight brings his own contingent of soldiers with him to the battle field. It is not a regular paid army as we have today.
Red is the base colour of the King's own banner - so it is not inappropriate to colour the tabbards red. However you could equally paint them white - or more natural colours like Kahki.
The bright coats of arms of medieval knights at this time is reserved for the wealthier Knights. The majority while carrying their arms on their Shield - would still be likely to have a plain uncoloured surcoat.
The personal guard of a particular knight may display the Knight's arms on their tabbards - often a small version of the shield like a badge on the chest.
Don't go mad on colour with regular soldiers - keep your colours muted - red looks great - but white also looks good. You can add the cross of St George - but unlikely to see this on all your soldiers as it would be very expensive to kit out an entire army with embroidered tabbards.
|
|
ivan
Brigand
Posts: 10
|
Post by ivan on Dec 9, 2006 13:53:02 GMT -5
At the filme BraveHeart they're orange
|
|
|
Post by eBob on Dec 9, 2006 14:33:09 GMT -5
No - they're red. The Kings banner is red - not orange.
|
|
ivan
Brigand
Posts: 10
|
Post by ivan on Dec 9, 2006 15:12:09 GMT -5
Bah, i could swear they're a kind of dark orange
|
|
|
Post by eBob on Dec 9, 2006 15:39:35 GMT -5
well, bright red can look orange - but it's unlikely that orange is the intended colour since they are wearing the Kings arms - 3 lions on red.
|
|
|
Post by tombombadilo on Dec 9, 2006 18:32:37 GMT -5
*cough* nods toward Ebob
|
|
theye
Longbowman
Posts: 35
|
Post by theye on Dec 27, 2006 6:28:53 GMT -5
well, i'm probably being really unconventional, but i'm planning on painting mine a sort-of darkish green and white colour scheme. i'm hoping it'll look quite good - i'll post some piccies when i get round to doing it!
theye
|
|